Comparing a Linguistic and a Stochastic Tagger

Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Description

Concerning different approaches to automatic PoS tagging: EngCG-2, a constraint-based morphological tagger, is compared in a double-blind test with a state-of-the-art statistical tagger on a common disambiguation task using a common tag set. The experiments show that for the same amount of remaining ambiguity, the error rate of the statistical tagger is one order of magnitude greater than that of the rule-based one. The two related issues of priming effects compromising the results and disagreement between human annotators are also addressed.
8 pages, LaTeX, 2 postscript figures. E-ACL'97

Keywords

Computation and Language

Citation

URI

http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/151469

Consulte el texto completo en el siguiente enlace:

https://arxiv.org/abs/cmp-lg/9706005
 http://arxiv.org/abs/cmp-lg/9706005

Collections

arXiv