Hong et al. reply to Walliser
| dc.creator | Hong, Daniel C. | |
| dc.creator | Quinn, Paul V. | |
| dc.creator | Luding, Stefan | |
| dc.date | 2002-02-21 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T02:44:30Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T02:44:30Z | |
| dc.description | We find it absurd that Walliser [1] essentially used the same analysis and obtained identical results as reported in [3], yet arrived at different conclusions. Namely, based on an incomplete theory and using erroneous arguments, he not only disputes the original results [2], but also claims them wrong. A more complete theory and much more detailed studies were published in [3], from which we concluded that such results support the mechanism of segregation introduced in ref. [2]. We want to make it clear that Walliser obtained partial results of ref. [3] and arrived at the opposite conclusion. In the following we discuss his comment and its relevance, but at the same time point out what went wrong with his arguments. | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0202384 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0202384 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/18946 | |
| dc.subject | Statistical Mechanics | |
| dc.title | Hong et al. reply to Walliser | |
| dc.type | text |