Another Comment on ``Quantum Entanglement and Nonexistence of Superluminal Signals''

Simple item page
dc.creatorMashkevich, Vladimir S.
dc.date1998-03-12
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T06:14:51Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T06:14:51Z
dc.descriptionWe argue that the claim given in quant-ph/9801014 remains untenable in the revised version. The fallacy in the proof is a misinterpretation of the no-cloning and teleportation theorems, which do not involve time and reference frames.
dc.description4 pages, LATEX 2.09
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9803027
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9803027
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/93621
dc.subjectQuantum Physics
dc.titleAnother Comment on ``Quantum Entanglement and Nonexistence of Superluminal Signals''
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv