How NP got a new definition: a survey of probabilistically checkable proofs
| dc.creator | Arora, Sanjeev | |
| dc.date | 2003-04-28 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-07-07T12:12:31Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-07-07T12:12:31Z | |
| dc.description | We survey a collective achievement of a group of researchers: the PCP Theorems. They give new definitions of the class \np, and imply that computing approximate solutions to many \np-hard problems is itself \np-hard. Techniques developed to prove them have had many other consequences. | |
| dc.identifier | https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0304038 | |
| dc.identifier | http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0304038 | |
| dc.identifier | Proceedings of the ICM, Beijing 2002, vol. 3, 637--648 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/210567 | |
| dc.subject | Computational Complexity | |
| dc.subject | 68Q10, 68Q15, 68Q17, 68Q25 | |
| dc.subject | F.1 | |
| dc.title | How NP got a new definition: a survey of probabilistically checkable proofs | |
| dc.type | text |