Schwinger's Magnetic Model of Matter: Can It Help Us With Grand Unification?

Simple item page
dc.creatorWerbos, Paul J.
dc.date2007-07-17
dc.date2008-01-08
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T08:52:43Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T08:52:43Z
dc.descriptionMany have argued that research on grand unification or local realistic physics will not be truly relevant until it makes predictions verified by experiment, different from the prediction of prior theory (the standard model). This paper proposes a new strategy (and candidate Lagrangians) for such models; that strategy in turn calls for reconsideration of Schwinger's magnetic model of matter. High priority should be given to experiments which fully confirm or deny recent scattering calculations which suggest the presence of van der Waals effects in low energy p-p and pi-pi scattering, consistent with Schwinger's model and inconsistent with QCD as we know it (with a mass gap). I briefly discuss other evidence, which does not yet rule out Schwinger's theory. A recent analysis of hadron masses also seems more consistent with the Schwinger model than with QCD.
dc.descriptionutter heresy claiming that new mathematical results from quantum optics and new results on scattering and mass spectra suggest that maybe Einstein was right after all -- with a classical stochastic unified model. Updated 1/2008 to add additional confirmatory info from CERN & info on questions in appendix
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/0707.2520
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/0707.2520
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/145372
dc.subjectGeneral Physics
dc.subjectClassical Physics
dc.titleSchwinger's Magnetic Model of Matter: Can It Help Us With Grand Unification?
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv