Why we shouldn't fault Lucas and Penrose for continuing to believe in the Goedelian argument against computationalism

Simple item page
dc.creatorAnand, Bhupinder Singh
dc.date2006-07-14
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-07T07:18:21Z
dc.date.available2026-07-07T07:18:21Z
dc.descriptionThe only fault we can fairly lay at Lucas' and Penrose's doors, for continuing to believe in the essential soundness of the Goedelian argument, is their naive faith in, first, non-verifiable assertions in standard expositions of classical theory, and, second, in Goedel's unvalidated interpretation of his own formal reasoning. We show why their faith is misplaced in both instances.
dc.description22 pages; an HTML version is available at http://alixcomsi.com/Why%20we%20shouldnt.htm
dc.identifierhttps://arxiv.org/abs/math/0607333
dc.identifierhttp://arxiv.org/abs/math/0607333
dc.identifier.urihttp://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/114269
dc.subjectGeneral Mathematics
dc.subject03B10
dc.titleWhy we shouldn't fault Lucas and Penrose for continuing to believe in the Goedelian argument against computationalism
dc.typetext

Files

Collections

arXiv