2026-07-072026-07-07http://salesiana.dossiersoluciones.com/handle/123456789/178777We report on an investigation of the LANL method for determining the O(a) improvement coefficient c_A nonperturbatively. We find we are able to extract reliable estimates for the coefficient using this method. However, our study of systematic errors shows that for very accurate determinations of c_A, the smearing function must be tuned and the volume fixed to keep the O(a) ambiguity in c_A fixed as beta varies. Consistency was found with previous results from the LANL group and (within fairly large errors) 1-loop perturbation theory; c_A does not change significantly over the range beta=5.93-6.2. The big difference between our results and those of the ALPHA collaboration, around beta=6.0, show that the O(a) differences in c_A between the different methods can be large. We find that the lattice spacing dependence of f_pi and the renormalised quark mass is much smaller using our values of the coefficient compared to those of the ALPHA collaboration.19 pages revtex, 13 tables, 15 figuresHigh Energy Physics - LatticeA nonperturbative determination of the O(a) improvement coefficient c_A and the scaling of f_pi and m^{MSbar}text